ArticleEndoscopy international open2026
Use of rebamipide solution as a submucosal injection material to prevent esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: Animal study.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: It is desirable to develop a safe, cost-effective, and easy approach to prevent strictures after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We explored use of a novel rebamipide solution, an anti-ulcer drug, as a submucosal injection material for preventing esophageal stricture after ESD. Methods: In 15 swine, two half-circumferential ESDs were performed at the proximal and distal ends of the middle thoracic esophagus using 2% rebamipide solution or saline (control) as submucosal injection material. Five swine were sacrificed on postoperative days (PODs) 7, 14, and 21, respectively. Follow-up endoscopy was performed weekly until sacrifice. ESD-related outcomes, degree of stricture, and histological characteristics were evaluated. Results: ESD-related outcomes were similar in both groups, with all post-ESD ulcers epithelialized by POD 14. Mean mucosal constriction rate in the rebamipide and control groups on PODs 14 and 21 were 19.1 ± 7.2% vs. 21.0 ± 6.4% ( Conclusions: The rebamipide solution showed no statistically significant benefit in preventing post-ESD stricture. However, given the small sample size of this study, further studies are needed to clarify its potential role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.