Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42016475›Full record

ArticleThe journal of climate change and health

Assessing climate change preparedness in hospitals and nursing homes in Hesse, Germany.

Caroline Maria Körner, Max Geraedts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of climate change and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline Maria KörnerInstitute for Health Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Marburg University, Marburg, Hesse, Germany.
Max GeraedtsInstitute for Health Services Research and Clinical Epidemiology, Marburg University, Marburg, Hesse, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vulnerable groups are particularly affected by climate change. The healthcare sector is responsible for approximately 6% of the greenhouse gas emissions in Germany. It remains unclear to what extent hospitals and nursing homes in Germany have already implemented climate mitigation and adaptation measures. Materials and methods: The study was conducted in the predominantly rural Marburg-Fulda region of Hesse, Germany, which has a population of 2,028,359. A total of 91 of the 300 nursing homes (30%) and seven of the 32 hospitals (22%) from this region participated in a semi-standardized telephone survey. Data were collected between January 28, 2025, and July 31, 2025. Data were first analyzed descriptively. In the next step, the Fisher‒Freeman‒Halton test was used to identify correlations between institutional characteristics and various climate mitigation and adaptation measures. Results: Nursing home size was positively correlated with the presence of climate mitigation guidelines ( Conclusion: Hospitals and nursing homes in the Marburg-Fulda region are not yet climate-resilient. Implementing such measures often fails because of a lack of resources. To create a climate-resilient healthcare system, targeted financial and structural support is needed from policymakers.

Indexed as

Climate adaptationClimate mitigationClimate resilienceHeat protectionHospitalsNursing homes

Identifiers

PMID42016475
PMCPMC13092870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.