Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42016468›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026

Short- and long-term risk stratification in acutely ill medical patients by implementing D-dimer in the emergency setting - A prospective cohort study.

Andrea Kornfehl, Roman Brock, Julia Oppenauer, Felix Eibensteiner, Christoph Veigl, Marco Neymayer, Karolina Valentova, Alexandra Julia Lipa, Markus Müller, Tim Dreier and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Andrea KornfehlDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Roman BrockDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Julia OppenauerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Felix EibensteinerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Christoph VeiglDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Marco NeymayerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Karolina ValentovaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Alexandra Julia LipaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Markus MüllerDivision of Angiology, Department of Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Tim DreierDivision of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Philip VerdonckDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium.
Patrick MucherDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Thomas PerkmannDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Helmuth HaslacherDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Oliver SchlagerDivision of Angiology, Department of Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Sebastian SchnaubeltDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: D-dimer testing is commonly used in emergency departments (EDs) to rule out thromboembolic events. However, elevated D-dimer levels may also be associated with an increased risk of mortality, independent of thromboembolism. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled acutely ill medical ED patients. D-dimer measurements were conducted as part of biobanking at ED presentation. Survival at 30, 90, and 360 days was analyzed in relation to D-dimer, and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regressions were performed. Results: A total of 1035 patients were included (56% male; 61 years [IQR 46-74]). Median follow-up was 764 days (7.7% mortality). Elevated D-dimer (≥0.5 μg/mL) was observed in 46.4% of patients. Thirty-day mortality was 4.8% in patients with elevated D-dimer versus 0.2% with normal D-dimer levels (log-rank Conclusion: In unselected ED patients, D-dimer independently predicts 30- and 360-day mortality. Beyond its diagnostic role for VTE, an elevated D-dimer-particularly in patients with no VTE and discharge from the ED-identifies individuals at increased short- and long-term risk. Incorporating D-dimer (e.g., ≥ 0.75 μg/mL) into routine risk stratification may support targeted follow-up and post-discharge management.

Indexed as

D-dimerEmergency departmentMortalityRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID42016468
PMCPMC13094509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.