ArticleBrain & spine2026
From deficit to recovery: postoperative neurological improvements in patients with severe cubital tunnel syndrome.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is a prevalent focal neuropathy causing motor and sensory deficits in the hand. Some patients present with marked muscle atrophy and impaired hand function, indicating significant nerve damage. Research question: The aim of this prospective study was to ascertain the long-term benefits of surgical intervention for these patients. Material and methods: Patients diagnosed with CuTS who underwent surgical treatment in the authors' department between January 2018 and December 2021 were screened. Patients with visible muscle atrophy and severe hand weakness, classified as grade IIb or III according to the modified McGowan classification, were included within this prospective study. A comprehensive data set was collected and analysed, encompassing clinical data, demographics, high-resolution ultrasound examinations and electrophysiological examinations. These were collected and analysed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at six and twelve months after surgery. Results: A total of 40 patients (26 male (65%), mean age: 55.02 ± 1.88 years) were successfully enrolled in the study. Of those, 18 patients (45%) underwent endoscopically assisted in situ decompression, while open decompression and transposition were performed in the remaining 22 individuals (55%). Neurologically, 24 patients (58.54%) were classified as grade IIb. Postoperative hand power significantly improved (p < 0.001) at six and twelve months after surgery. Neurological improvement based on modified McGowan classification was also significant six (p = 0.016) and twelve months (p = 0.002) after surgery. Discussion and conclusion: Patients with severe CuTS neurologically recover after decompression. Therefore, surgical therapy could be offered to those patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.