Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42016444›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2026

The LAST Mile: Evaluating Genetic Biocontrol as a Supplemental Tool for Eradicating Invasive Rodents on Islands.

Aysegul Birand, Bruce A Hay, Matthew Combs, Luke Gierus, Katherine E Horak, Kevin P Oh, Louise J Robertson, Paul Q Thomas, Ana M Velasquez-Escobar, David J Will and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Y-linked editors for invasive rodent control.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Aysegul BirandSchool of Biological Sciences University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia.
Bruce A HayDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering California Institute of Technology Pasadena California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5486-0482
Matthew CombsUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1928-2485
Luke GierusSchool of Biomedicine and Robinson Research Institute University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia.
Katherine E HorakUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.
Kevin P OhCSIRO Health and Biosecurity Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.
Louise J RobertsonSchool of Biomedicine and Robinson Research Institute University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2926-1231
Paul Q ThomasSchool of Biomedicine and Robinson Research Institute University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5002-5770
Ana M Velasquez-EscobarInterdisciplinary Graduate Program in Genetics and Genomics, Department of Cell Biology and Genetics Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA.
David J WillIsland Conservation Santa Cruz California USA.
Maciej MaselkoApplied BioSciences Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7831-848X
Antoinette J PiaggioUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4701-0746

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive rodents cause severe ecosystem degradation on islands and can be challenging to eradicate. Current best-practices rely on the application of toxic oral baits and have led to successful eradications and remarkable recoveries of native flora and fauna. Yet this single method is not universally applicable. Genetic biocontrol offers a suite of new solutions to potentially improve outcomes in the critical "last mile" of eradication. These approaches involve the release of genetically modified individuals of the target species to reduce population fitness over time. These include self-limiting approaches which require multiple releases and self-sustaining mechanisms (i.e., select gene-drive systems) which could theoretically collapse populations after a single release. While gene drive systems have received significant attention, their development in vertebrates remains technically challenging, and their ecological and regulatory implications are still in active debate. In contrast, some non-drive genetic biocontrol approaches, such as Y-linked editors, fsRIDL, and Gravid Lethal, offer self-limiting alternatives that may be more immediately deployable. These approaches could be used to supplement toxicant-based methods and may also have reduced environmental risks and regulatory barriers. To evaluate the potential of these tools, we developed an individual-based model simulating the eradication of house mice (

Indexed as

genetic biocontrolGravid Lethalhouse mouseLAST “last mile”Mus musculustoxicant

Identifiers

PMID42016444
PMCPMC13092493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.