ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2026
Surveying the features of screening strategies for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A scoping review.
Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease, affecting about one-quarter of the general population worldwide. Owing to the prevalence and high burden of NAFLD in special groups, this study aimed to examine the features of screening strategies for NAFLD in special populations. We carried out a scoping review using the main online databases (Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science) with the following keywords: Screening, Nonalcoholic fatty liver, willingness to pay, economic evaluation, and preferences. We included publications from January 1, 2000, to August 27, 2024, which focused on NAFLD screening strategies in special populations. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the QADAS checklist. The AUC ranged from 0.5 to 93.30, the maximum value corresponding to the WC test in the MAFLD population. The highest sensitivity and specificity were related to the BMI test (96.89) and the BRI test in the T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.