ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026
Data mining approach to predicting of death in patients with COVID-19.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the World Health Organization's announcement that the coronavirus pandemic had ended in 2020, the nature of the disease remains unclear, and there are no proven treatments, including effective drugs, to treat and prevent patient death. Therefore, this study was designed to predict the risk of death in hospitalized COVID-19 patients using modern statistical modeling and machine learning techniques. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted on data from the COVID-19 disease registration program in 2024. Various machine learning algorithms were used to analyze the data. The performance of the models used was evaluated by determining accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). The final model was used to determine the most important predictors.
resultsThe area under the ROC curve for the three models (LR, NN, and NB) is used to compare their performance. The LR model has the highest accuracy (AUC = 95.7). Accordingly, the most important variables predicting death in patients were WBC, BUN, age, and glucose levels. As a result, the model accurately predicted the risk of death in patients by 77.17%, with an accuracy of 95% and a sensitivity of 88.02. In addition, the results of the model test showed that the model can predict the risk of death by 94.54% and the probability of survival by 93.81%.
conclusionBased on the results, the most important variables predicting death from COVID-19 were WBC, BUN, age, and glucose levels in patients, so that the model was able to predict the risk of death in hospitalized patients with very high accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.