ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2026
Clinician acceptability and use of smartphone digital photography in sexual assault forensic examination in an Australian regional district's sexual assault services.
Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photography supports written and diagrammatic clinical documentation in forensic sexual assault examinations. In settings where specialist photographers are not available, clinician confidence in image capture affects the usage of photography as a clinical tool. A regional Australian health district with multiple sexual assault services across metropolitan, regional and rural sites had previously low usage of photography to support clinical documentation of injury. Smartphones were introduced as image capture devices and procedures were implemented to support their use and the secure storage of images. Training was provided to medical and nursing staff. In cases where injuries were present, the use of photography increased significantly from 13% to 27% (p = 0.0041). Surveys were conducted of clinicians to examine factors affecting use of and attitudes to photography in sexual assault examinations, both prior to and three years after introducing the new devices. Smartphones were generally well accepted by clinicians as an easy-to-use alternative to traditional single lens reflex (SLR) camera photography, particularly for documenting complex injuries that are hard to describe in words and diagrams alone. Smartphone photography may be particularly useful for rural and regional settings where clinicians have a lower caseload and therefore less regular experience with photography equipment, and no access to specialist forensic photographers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.