ReviewiScience2026
CRISPR-Cas9 engineering of CAR-T cells: Can non-viral nanoparticles unlock safer and scalable genome editing?
Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CAR-T cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Still, durable activity in tumors remains limited by antigen heterogeneity and escape, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and restricted persistence. Genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas systems offers a powerful route to reprogram CAR-T cells; however, translation increasingly depends on how editing payloads are delivered. Viral vectors remain a benchmark for efficient gene transfer, cargo constraints, insertional risk, immunogenicity, and manufacturing complexity motivate the development of safer, more scalable non-viral platforms. In this review, we provide an overview of CAR designs, clinical use, and current
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.