ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2026
qCON and qNOX-Guided Sedation Monitoring During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Prospective Observational Preliminary Study.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06604156 (The Effect of the Nociception Index), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of the Nociception Index (qNOX) in Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy :a Clinical Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The depth of sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy is predominantly assessed based on clinical experience due to the absence of a universally recognized objective standard. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of two novel electroencephalography-derived parameters, the quantitative consciousness index (qCON) and the quantitative nociception index (qNOX), for sedation and analgesia monitoring, and to determine the optimal qCON range correlated with optimal procedural stability. Methods: In this prospective observational study, a total of 220 patients scheduled for elective gastroscopy or colonoscopy were enrolled. All patients received propofol and sufentanil for sedation and analgesia according to routine clinical practice. Depth of anesthesia and nociceptive responses were continuously monitored using qCON and qNOX. Hemodynamic parameters, body movement, and coughing were recorded at predefined time points. The primary outcome was defined as optimal procedural stability, characterized by hemodynamic fluctuations within 10% of baseline combined with the absence of body movement or coughing. Results: A qCON range of 55-63 was observed to be associated with optimal procedural stability (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.25-62.62 for gastroscopy; 55.25-62.52 for colonoscopy). A strong correlation between qCON and qNOX was observed (gastroscopy: qNOX = 0.78 × qCON + 26.1, Conclusion: The qCON index appears to provide an objective approach to assessing sedation depth in sedated gastrointestinal endoscopy. Our findings suggest that qCON values within the range of 55 to 63 are associated with optimal procedural stability as defined in this study. Combined monitoring with qCON and qNOX may provide complementary information to support a balanced approach to intra-procedural sedation management, thereby potentially enhancing the safety and overall quality of sedation management. Trial Registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration Number: NCT06604156) on April 11, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.