ArticleRevista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia)2025
[Barriers and facilitators of two pilot projects of telemonitoring aimed at patients with diabetes
Article in Revista de salud publica (Bogota, Colombia), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To characterize the implementation process, barriers, and facilitators of two pilot telemonitoring projects targeting patients with type 2 diabetes Methods: This qualitative case study included 22 participants: health directors, managers, professionals, and technicians involved in the intervention. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews and document review. The information was analyzed using content and thematic analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Ethical considerations outlined by E. Emanuel were followed. Results: The main barriers included lack of involvement in decision-making, poor planning, process complexity, limited resources, poor connectivity, insufficient integration between electronic devices, and an unfriendly platform. Facilitators were centered on positive attitudes toward the intervention and the perceived usefulness for managing chronic conditions. Conclusions: The primary barriers identified were related to the management of the implementation process and technological aspects, while the most notable facilitators were attitudinal. This information could serve as a reference for future studies aiming to implement digital tools in various healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.