ArticleiScience2026
Characterization and source analysis of soil pollution in aluminum processing industry based on source inventory.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the current lack of soil pollution investigations and the significant limitations in soil pollution tracing methods within the aluminum (AI) processing industry, this study profiles its pollution by using data from ten typical enterprises across China. Leveraging the team's prior soil source inventory approach (SIA), we established a comprehensive traceability system to enable precise source analysis. The results identified petroleum hydrocarbons (C10-C40) as priority pollutants. The two key contamination zones were production and solid waste storage/disposal areas, and the two major pollution pathways were solid waste leaching and wastewater leakage. The source analysis was validated in multiple dimensions, and the calculated total pollutant input (40.42 kg) exhibited a ˂20% deviation from the measured soil contamination (34.7 kg). The spatial distribution of the modeled pollutant inputs correlated reasonably well with the empirical data (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.