Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42016052›Full record

ArticleGlobal epidemiology2026

Estimation of the global number of nicotine vapers in 2025.

Tomasz Jerzyński, Giorgi Mzhavanadze, Gerry V Stimson

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tomasz JerzyńskiThe Robert Zajonc Institute for Social Studies, University of Warsaw, Poland.
Giorgi MzhavanadzeKnowledge Action Change, 5 Heatherfold Way, Pinner, Middlesex HA5 2LG, UK.
Gerry V StimsonKnowledge Action Change, 5 Heatherfold Way, Pinner, Middlesex HA5 2LG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Global estimates of adult use of nicotine vaping devices are limited by uneven survey coverage and substantial gaps in country-level data. We therefore developed a structured three-stage approach to synthesize available evidence and generate approximate estimates of the current and projected global number of adult nicotine vaping users. Methods: We used national survey data on vaping prevalence from 92 countries (2013-2023). In Stage 1, missing prevalence values were imputed using hierarchical groupings based on World Bank income level, UN subregion, and regulatory status. In Stage 2, prevalence was projected to 2025 for all 198 countries using inflation-adjusted national vaping market size as a growth proxy, applying country-specific ratios where available and regional estimates otherwise. In Stage 3, projected prevalence was combined with UN adult population data to estimate global user numbers. Results: The estimated global number of adult nicotine vape users reached approximately 129 million in 2025, up from over 50 million in 2018 and just over 114 million in 2023. Countries without survey evidence contribute only ∼18% of this global approximation in 2025. Growth was concentrated in higher-income countries and less restrictive regulatory environments. Conclusions: Adult nicotine vaping is now a substantial but unevenly distributed global phenomenon, concentrated in specific regulatory and economic contexts. While estimates remain subject to meaningful uncertainty, the results indicate that participation in vaping has reached population-relevant levels in multiple regions.

Indexed as

E-cigarettesEstimationNicotinePrevalenceTobacco harm reductionVaping

Identifiers

PMID42016052
PMCPMC13092760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.