ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
CERN 09-02: A phase 2 trial of carboplatin and bevacizumab for recurrent adult ependymomas.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low-Grade Glioma Clinical Trials in the United States: A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Salvage therapies for adults with recurrent ependymoma are limited. A prior retrospective review of patients with recurrent ependymomas treated with bevacizumab and carboplatin reported a 75% radiographic response rate. This prospective single-arm, open-label Phase 2 study was designed to assess clinical efficacy of this regimen. Methods: Twenty-two patients were evaluated in this CERN Adult Clinical Trials network study. Adult patients (age ≥18) with recurrent ependymomas received carboplatin (AUC = 5-6) every 4 weeks and bevacizumab 10mg/kg every 2 weeks for 6 cycles, after which carboplatin was discontinued, while bevacizumab could be continued at physician's discretion. Imaging of areas involved and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (brain and/or spine modules) were assessed at baseline and every 2 cycles. Results: With a median follow-up time of 25.9 months (mo), the primary endpoint of 12-mo progression-free survival rate (PFS-12) greater than 50% was reached, with a rate of 76.4% (95% CI, 52.2, 89.4). The median PFS of this cohort was 18.0 mo. Two patients achieved objective partial responses (9.1%). There were no treatment-related grade ≥4 toxicities. Brain tumor responders (radiographic objective response or stable disease) experienced improved cognitive and neurological symptoms, while spine tumor patients reported worsening symptom outcomes regardless of response. Conclusions: Treatment with carboplatin and bevacizumab in adult recurrent ependymomas met the PFS-12 clinical efficacy endpoint. However, symptomatic worsening in spinal tumors suggests imaging stability and symptom improvement in brain disease may be related to bevacizumab pseudo-response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.