Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42016022›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

CERN 09-02: A phase 2 trial of carboplatin and bevacizumab for recurrent adult ependymomas.

Shuodan Zhang, Byram H Ozer, Antonio Omuro, Ying Yuan, Tito Mendoza, Kathleen Wall, Eva Grajkowska, Elizabeth Vera, Jennifer Reyes, Kenneth Aldape and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Shuodan ZhangNeuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0525-5600
Byram H OzerNeuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5644-2733
Antonio OmuroDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4299-3664
Ying YuanNeuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3163-480X
Tito MendozaNeuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kathleen WallNeuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Eva GrajkowskaNeuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Elizabeth VeraNeuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5990-7705
Jennifer ReyesNeuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kenneth AldapeLaboratory of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA (K.A.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5119-7550
Marta Penas-PradoDepartment of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jing WuNeuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-9646
Eric C BurtonNeuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Tobias WalbertDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0667-8106
Tom MikkelsenDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Shiao-Pei WeathersDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0405-102X
Barbara O'BrienDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
John de GrootDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1454-6461
Vinay PuduvalliDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Lisa DeAngelisDepartment of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Elena PentsovaDepartment of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5854-0251
Thomas J KaleyDepartment of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Igor GavrilovicDepartment of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Elizabeth R GerstnerDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Terri S ArmstrongNeuro-Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mark R GilbertDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Salvage therapies for adults with recurrent ependymoma are limited. A prior retrospective review of patients with recurrent ependymomas treated with bevacizumab and carboplatin reported a 75% radiographic response rate. This prospective single-arm, open-label Phase 2 study was designed to assess clinical efficacy of this regimen. Methods: Twenty-two patients were evaluated in this CERN Adult Clinical Trials network study. Adult patients (age ≥18) with recurrent ependymomas received carboplatin (AUC = 5-6) every 4 weeks and bevacizumab 10mg/kg every 2 weeks for 6 cycles, after which carboplatin was discontinued, while bevacizumab could be continued at physician's discretion. Imaging of areas involved and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (brain and/or spine modules) were assessed at baseline and every 2 cycles. Results: With a median follow-up time of 25.9 months (mo), the primary endpoint of 12-mo progression-free survival rate (PFS-12) greater than 50% was reached, with a rate of 76.4% (95% CI, 52.2, 89.4). The median PFS of this cohort was 18.0 mo. Two patients achieved objective partial responses (9.1%). There were no treatment-related grade ≥4 toxicities. Brain tumor responders (radiographic objective response or stable disease) experienced improved cognitive and neurological symptoms, while spine tumor patients reported worsening symptom outcomes regardless of response. Conclusions: Treatment with carboplatin and bevacizumab in adult recurrent ependymomas met the PFS-12 clinical efficacy endpoint. However, symptomatic worsening in spinal tumors suggests imaging stability and symptom improvement in brain disease may be related to bevacizumab pseudo-response.

Indexed as

adult recurrent ependymomabevacizumabcarboplatin

Identifiers

PMID42016022
PMCPMC13092514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.