Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42015991›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2011

Overview of the procedures currently used at EFSA for the assessment of dietary exposure to different chemical substances.

European Food Safety Authority

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Risk assessment of complex organoarsenic species in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  4. Guidance on risk-benefit assessment of foods.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  5. Risk assessment of small organoarsenic species in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Update of the risk assessment of hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDDs) in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021
    Article
  18. Risk assessment of ochratoxin A in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

European Food Safety Authority

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health impact of chemical hazards in food is estimated by comparing dietary exposure to toxicological levels of concern. Exposure assessments combine data on concentrations of a chemical substance present in food with the quantity of those foods consumed. Some guidance documents have been produced over the last ten years at international level that describe the current state-of-the-art of methodologies for dietary exposure assessment with little harmonisation across disciplines. A number of different methods exist ranging from quick worst-case estimations to refined methods aimed at assessing actual exposure. As the accuracy of dietary exposure assessments increases, the cost of undertaking the assessments also increases. An EFSA opinion affirms that exposure assessment has to be conservative and that a stepwise approach should be used commensurate with specific needs. However, some of the methodological differences among Panels are not fully justified by the specific requirements of the class of substances under evaluation. There is potential to further harmonise the way exposure is estimated with the availability of more refined and accurate food consumption information in EFSA. To improve chemical concentration data statistically based sampling frames could be developed in collaboration with Member States for their monitoring programs and a coordinated approach of using data from Total Diet Studies could be promoted. There is a need to further harmonise the screening methods used across Panels and the modelling of high consumers for calculating chronic exposure using individual data and summary statistics. It is suggested to always consider children, and in particular toddlers, since they are often at the high end when calculating exposure. It is considered useful to explore the use of probabilistic dietary exposure assessments on a more routine basis in case refinements are needed, of cumulative exposure assessment for all metabolically or structurally related chemical substances, and to test statistical methodologies for the estimation of usual intake from short-term dietary data.

Indexed as

acutechemicalschronicExposurefood consumptionharmonisationscreening

Identifiers

PMID42015991
PMCPMC13093108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.