ArticleSurgery in practice and science2026
Late reoperative surgery after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: A novel pancreaticogastrostomy
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Minimal-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy has become an established procedure for pancreatic head tumors. Local recurrence or anastomotic stricture requiring reoperation is uncommon, and no standardized approach exists for re-anastomosis of the pancreatic remnant. This article demonstrates a novel modified locking technique of Blumgart pancreaticogastrostomy applied during re-laparoscopy. Methods: The locking Blumgart pancreaticogastrostomy was performed in four layers: the posterior pancreatic stump-to-stomach layer, the posterior and lateral pancreatic duct-to-gastric mucosa layer, the anterior pancreatic duct-to-gastric mucosa layer, and the anterior pancreatic stump-to-stomach layer. Results: Three cases of the pancreatogastric anastomosis procedure were carried out. No postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred, with no incidence of pancreatogastric anastomotic stricture observed during follow-up. The technical rationale of this anastomotic approach include: 1) avoidance of resection of the original afferent jejunal limb, 2) a more physiological mucosa-to-mucosa adaptation between the pancreatic duct and gastric wall, and 3) use of a locking mattress suture to achieve more complete hemostasis, and 4) separate suturing of the anterior/posterior and lateral walls of both the pancreatic duct and gastric mucosa. Conclusions: The modified locking Blumgart pancreaticogastrostomy is technically feasible and demonstrates preliminary safety in reoperative surgery for late local tumor recurrence or anastomotic stricture at the pancreaticojejunal site following minimal-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.