ArticleNeurology. Genetics2026
Novel
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: ADP-ribosylation is a post-translational modification critical for DNA repair, chromatin remodeling, and cellular stress responses. The enzyme ARH3/ADPRHL2 (encoded by the Methods: Clinical identification and diagnosis of the patient was based primarily on MRI and whole exome sequencing. Functional assays were performed in patient fibroblast cell lines using Western blotting and immunofluorescence-based assays and compared with an ARH3 KO cell line generated by CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Results: Our data indicate that the novel p.Leu162Pro variant, combined with a known nonsense variant, c.316C>T; p.Gln106*, causes a severe reduction of ARH3 protein levels in patient fibroblasts. This leads to defective ARH3-dependent removal of ADP-ribosylation, both under basal conditions and following oxidative stress. Our results using minocycline indicate that it is a poor PARP1 inhibitor and was ineffective in reducing basal ADP-ribosylation in ARH3-deficient cells. Discussion: This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on ARH3 deficiency associated with CONDSIAS, by identifying a new pathogenic variant and questioning the molecular rationale underlying the therapeutic use of minocycline in patients with CONDSIAS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.