Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42015940›Full record

ArticleJournal of scientific innovation in medicine2024

Three Pilot Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating a Persuasive Health Communication Intervention for Adult Emergency Department Patients Declining HIV/HCV Testing.

Roland C Merchant, Melissa A Clark, Michael P Carey, Tao Liu, George Loo, Ethan A Cowan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of scientific innovation in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roland C MerchantDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, US.ORCID 0000-0001-7571-1294
Melissa A ClarkDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, US.ORCID 0000-0001-6104-8639
Michael P CareyDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University, US.ORCID 0000-0003-4652-964X
Tao LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Brown University, US.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-4445
George LooDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, US; Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, US.ORCID 0000-0002-3674-0567
Ethan A CowanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, US.ORCID 0000-0002-7276-0549

Funding

Development and Pilot Testing of a Persuasive Health Communication Intervention for Emergency Department Patients Who Decline Rapid HIV/HCV ScreeningR34DA045544 · NIDA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WEINER, SCOTT GORDON · 2018 to 2019
$694k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA045544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The lack of evidence-based interventions to overcome patient refusal limits the success of emergency department (ED)-based HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing for diagnostic purposes or screening. We created a persuasive health communication intervention (PHCI) designed to overcome ED patient reluctance to accept HIV/HCV testing. In three pilot randomized controlled trials (pRCTs), we evaluated the performance of the PHCI when delivered by video or in-person by an HIV/HCV counselor, and as compared to a control condition video. Methods: Adult ED patients who declined HIV/HCV screening were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1 allocation) in each pRCT as follows: pRCT 1: PHCI video vs. control condition video; pRCT 2: PHCI delivered in-person by HIV/HCV counselor vs. control condition video; and pRCT 3: PHCI delivered in-person by HIV/HCV counselor vs. the PHCI video. The primary outcome for each pRCT was acceptance of HIV/HCV testing post-intervention. Results: Acceptance of HIV, HCV or both tests post-intervention was: pRCT 1: PHCI video (n = 27) vs. control condition video (n = 28), 29.6% vs. 10.7%; p = 0.08; pRCT 2: PHCI delivered in-person by HIV/HCV counselor (n = 30) vs. control condition video (n = 30), 10.0% vs. 26.7%; p = 0.09; and pRCT3: PHCI delivered in-person by HIV/HCV counselor (n = 29) vs. the PHCI video (n = 29), 48.3% vs. 34.5%; p = 0.29. Conclusions: The results from these pRCTs are encouraging. ED patients who initially declined HIV/HCV testing can be persuaded instead to be screened for these infections. The PHCI, whether delivered in-person by an HIV/HCV counselor or video, is a promising intervention to encourage screening for these infections.

Indexed as

emergency servicehepatitis CHIV testinghospitalpersuasive communication

Identifiers

PMID42015940
PMCPMC13093499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.