ArticleRenal failure2026
Explainable machine learning integrating bioelectrical impedance for 6-month cardiovascular risk in peritoneal dialysis.
Article in Renal failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a common treatment for end-stage renal disease, yet cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a major cause of morbidity. Inadequate fluid management can elevate CVD risk, and bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS) is increasingly used to assess fluid status. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence model integrating BIS measurements and medical history to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within six months in clinically stable PD patients. Data were stratified by MACE occurrence and subject, with 80% assigned to training and 20% to testing. Class imbalance was addressed using the synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Four algorithms - logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, and deep neural networks - were trained using fivefold cross-validation and grid search for optimal hyperparameters. Model performance was evaluated with area under the ROC curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Feature ablation experiments compared models using all 15 features, only 11 BIS-recorded features, and only 4 medical history features. The random forest model achieved the highest performance (AUC = 0.88), with CVD history as the most influential predictor. Isotonic regression calibration improved probability alignment (brier score = 0.0451). DCA suggested potential clinical benefit. While the model relied on four medical history features, its initial sensitivity was modest (0.68). Integrating BIS features significantly enhanced diagnostic sensitivity (0.84). The random forest model, based on 15 clinically accessible features, accurately predicts the risk of MACE within six months in clinically stable PD patients, demonstrating strong discriminatory ability with a performance reaching 88%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.