SynthesisBone & joint open2026
Learning curve in periacetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip : a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Bone & joint open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Surgeon experience in hip arthroscopy improves operative efficiency and reduces conversion to total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Pooled it
- Does travel distance influence short-term outcome after periacetabular osteotomy?-A cohort study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is technically demanding with an assumed steep learning curve. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated how surgeon experience influences operative efficiency, perioperative morbidity, radiological correction, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods: A systematic search of five databases identified studies comparing early with late PAO experience phases. Random-effects meta-analyses (Sidik-Jonkman with Hartung-Knapp adjustment) were performed for continuous (mean difference (MD)) and binary (odds ratios (ORs)) outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed with Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I), and certainty of evidence with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: In all, seven studies (499 patients, 556 hips) were included. Late-phase PAOs had significantly shorter operative times (MD -74.58 minutes, 95% CI -136.52 to -12.65). No significant differences were found for blood loss, complications, THA conversion, or radiological correction. Heterogeneity was high for operating time and blood loss, and most studies showed moderate risk of bias. Conclusion: Surgeon experience substantially improves operative efficiency in PAO, while complications, blood loss, radiological accuracy, and early THA conversion appear largely unaffected, likely reflecting structured supervision and high-volume training environments. The lack of significant differences in complications and radiological correction suggests that structured mentorship and centralized hip preservation programmes may mitigate early-phase risk. Standardized, prospective studies are needed to define proficiency thresholds and optimize training in hip preservation surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.