ReviewMolecular biology and evolution2026
From structural pangenomes to functional panomics in plants.
Review in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural Variation and Its Roles in Plant Genomes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- What has population genomics told us about the dynamics of selection and plant adaptation?Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Review
- Building and applying pangenome references to capture genetic diversity.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how genome structure and gene content evolve within and among plant species requires analytical frameworks that capture the full spectrum of allelic and structural variation. Plant pangenomes have progressed from gene-focused and linear representations to chromosome-scale, haplotype-resolved graphs that preserve allelic and structural diversity across populations. Attention is increasingly focused on the evolutionary processes that generate and maintain pangenome architecture, alongside the adoption of graph-based coordinate systems that reduce reference bias and enable multi-omics integration. Here, we review plant pangenome paradigms, from early homology-based gene sets to haplotype-resolved graph models, and summarize tradeoffs in construction, mapping, and variant analysis. We synthesize patterns of core and variable gene compartments across studies and examine how transposable elements, gene duplication, and selection shape their contrasting evolutionary dynamics. Using panNLRomes and crop domestication as case studies, we illustrate how graph-based frameworks clarify evolutionary and functional signals obscured by single references, including birth-death dynamics at resistance loci and structural variants associated with domestication. Finally, we discuss emerging applications in pantranscriptomics and panepigenomics and outline key methodological and infrastructural challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.