Trial reportGut and liver2026
Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Entecavir to Tenofovir Alafenamide in Chronic Hepatitis B: A Multicenter Randomized Trial in Korea.
Trial report in Gut and liver, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06000657 (Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Vemliver), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Vemliver (Tenofovir Alafenamide) From Entecavir in Chronic Hepatitis B: A Multi-Center, Phase IV, Open-Label, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Non-Inferiority Trial.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has emerged as a safe and effective alternative to entecavir (ETV) in the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching to TAF compared with maintaining ETV in patients with CHB who had achieved virologic suppression on ETV. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, noninferiority clinical trial conducted at 13 Korean centers, 196 CHB patients who had experienced virologic suppression after ≥24 weeks of ETV therapy were randomized 1:1 to switch to TAF (n=95) or continue on ETV (n=101). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <29 IU/mL at week 48 (per-protocol set). Secondary endpoints included alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization, hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B e antigen serologic responses, and safety outcomes. Results: Among 188 patients in the per-protocol set (89 TAF, 99 ETV), the HBV suppression rate at week 48 was 100.0% in the TAF group and 99.0% in the ETV group (difference, 1.03%; one-sided 97.5% confidence interval, -0.96 to infinity). ALT normalization rates at week 48 were comparable between groups (55.0% in TAF vs 38.7% in ETV; p=0.26; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases criteria). Hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion rates were also similar at week 48 (0.0% vs 12.5%; p=0.21). Safety profiles, including renal function, did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusions: Switching from ETV to TAF was noninferior to continuing ETV in maintaining virologic suppression, with comparable biochemical, serologic, and safety outcomes. (ClinicalTrials. gov identifier NCT06000657).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.