ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2026
An Artemisia scoparia Extract and Rosiglitazone Have Distinct but Overlapping Effects on Adipocyte Function.
Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unlocking the Potential ofBiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAn Artemisia scoparia extract (SCO) has been shown to enhance adipocyte function, improve insulin sensitivity, and regulate lipolysis. We evaluated the actions of SCO and rosiglitazone (ROSI) in adipocytes, focusing on PPARγ's role in their regulation.
methodsWe assessed PPARγ activation by measuring its half-life and the PPAR-dependent transcription of a luciferase reporter. We measured glycerol release from adipocytes with siRNA gene silencing or pharmacological inhibition of PPARγ. Immunoblotting was used to detect adiponectin and protein disulfide isomerase (PDI); transcriptional effects in SCO- and ROSI-treated cells were compared by RNA-seq.
resultsROSI and SCO both enhanced PPARγ degradation, a hallmark of ligand-induced activation. PPARγ transcriptional activity was induced in three cell types by ROSI, but in only one by SCO. PPARγ knockdown reversed the antilipolytic effects of both SCO and ROSI, while pharmacological inhibition only reversed the effect of ROSI. SCO treatment, but not ROSI, produced reduction-resistant adiponectin multimers and high-molecular-weight complexes of PDI. Transcriptional changes were more pronounced with ROSI than SCO, although the affected pathways were largely overlapping.
conclusionsSCO is a context-dependent PPARγ agonist with unique effects on redox-dependent protein multimerization. Transcriptional profiling indicates that SCO acts as a partial or selective PPARγ agonist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.