ArticleHGG advances2026
CCAFE: Estimating case and control allele frequencies from GWAS summary statistics.
Article in HGG advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic summary statistics can be used in a variety of analyses, such as causal inference, genetic correlation, and risk scores, to provide insights into the genetic architecture of conditions and traits. However, complete statistics are often not reported, limiting the utility of these data. Indeed, many post hoc analyses of diseases require case and control allele frequencies (AFs), which are not always published. Here, we present methods and software to derive case and control AFs from genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics using the odds ratio, case and control sample sizes, and either the total (case and control aggregated) AF or the standard error (SE). In simulations and real data, derivations of case and control AFs using total AFs are highly accurate, whereas using SE underestimates AFs when covariates were included in the GWAS. While estimating case and control AFs using the total AF is preferred due to its high accuracy, the SE is more commonly available. Thus, we developed a bias adjustment using gnomAD AFs as a proxy for true AFs, reducing bias when using the SE. The methods and software provided here expand the utility of publicly available genetic summary statistics and promote the reusability of genomic data. The R package Case-Control Allele Frequency Estimation (CCAFE) is freely available on Bioconductor and GitHub.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.