ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2026
In vivo systematic detection of the outcomes of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated DNA repair in skeletal muscle stem cells.
Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRSIPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) has revolutionized genome editing with broad therapeutic applications, yet its repair patterns in vivo remain poorly understood. Here, we systematically profile CRISPR-Cas9 editing outcomes at 95 loci using our established CRISPR-Cas9/adeno-associated virus (AAV)9-single guide RNA (sgRNA) system in skeletal muscle stem cells (MuSCs). Through comprehensive characterization of the repair outcomes, our findings demonstrate that the general rules governing CRISPR-Cas9-mediated editing in vivo largely align with those observed in vitro. In addition to the anticipated small editing insertions or deletions (indels), such as microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ)-mediated deletions and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)-mediated templated insertions, we uncover a prevalent occurrence of large on-target modifications, including large deletions (LDs) characterized by microhomology (MH) and large insertions (LIs). Notably, the LIs comprise not only exogenous AAV vector integrations but also endogenous genomic DNA fragments (Endo-LIs). Endo-LIs preferentially originate from active genomic regions, with their integration shaped by 3D chromatin architecture. By disrupting key components of the NHEJ and MMEJ repair pathways in vivo, we identify their distinct roles in regulating the large on-target modifications. Together, our work systematically profiles CRISPR-Cas9 repair outcomes in vivo and offers valuable guidance for improving the safety of CRISPR-Cas9-based gene therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.