ReviewChemical record (New York, N.Y.)2026
Crystalline Framework Electrodes for Hybrid Supercapacitors: Device-Oriented Design From Metal-Organic and Covalent Organic Frameworks to Practical Hybrids.
Review in Chemical record (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hybrid supercapacitors (SCs) aim to combine battery-like energy with capacitor-like power. However, progress is limited by electrode designs that trade capacity for slow kinetics, unstable interfaces, and poor areal or volumetric performance. This review examines crystalline framework electrodes, including metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs), as well as framework-derived materials, which combine ordered porosity with programmable redox chemistry. We develop a device-centered decision framework that links building-block chemistry and topology to charge-storage mode, ion transport, electrode density, and dominant failure pathways under two-electrode operation. We benchmark MOFs, COFs, composites, and derived phases across aqueous, organic, ionic-liquid, and gel electrolytes. We define minimum diagnostics to distinguish double-layer capacitance, surface-redox pseudocapacitance, and battery-like behavior in hybrid devices. To support translation from laboratory tests to practical electrodes, we synthesize strategies for conductivity and stability, including percolation-network design, pore-access engineering, conformal interface stabilization, and controlled reconstruction or derivatization, thereby broadening operating windows while suppressing dissolution, pore flooding, and impedance rise. Finally, we map degradation modes to mitigation levers and propose a fair-comparison checklist that prioritizes realistic mass loading, electrode density, and areal and volumetric metrics, enabling more durable, device-ready hybrid SCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.