ArticleMedical education online2026
Strengthening novice diagnostic problem solving through explicit metacognitive scaffolding in emergency medicine education.
Article in Medical education online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing purposeful observation during early clinical exposure in anesthesiology: a cluster-randomized study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetacognition is central to clinical diagnostic problem solving, yet few instructional models provide actionable guidance for embedding explicit metacognitive support into clinical training.
objectiveThis study aimed to introduce and evaluate the Metacognition-Integrated Instruction for Novice Diagnostic (MIND) learning model, a structured framework that integrates explicit metacognitive prompts into authentic diagnostic tasks, and to examine its impact on students' metacognitive abilities and their structural relationships.
designA pre-post study was conducted among 127 sixth-year medical students during a two-week emergency medicine rotation. The intervention began with a one-day MIND-based workshop, followed by repeated reinforcement of metacognitive activation in real clinical settings to support recall and transfer. Metacognitive ability was assessed using a validated Inventory of Metacognitive Self-Regulation in Diagnostic Problem Solving. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to evaluate changes in five metacognitive dimensions and their structural relationships.
resultsSignificant improvements were observed across all five metacognitive dimensions, with the largest gains in Objectivity and Monitoring, domains typically underdeveloped in novice diagnosticians. Structural analyses demonstrated invariance between pre- and post-intervention models, suggesting a stable underlying metacognitive structure. Knowledge of cognition and objectivity significantly predicted problem representation, which in turn predicted monitoring and evaluation. The direct path from objectivity to monitoring was not supported. No significant pre-post differences in path coefficients were identified, except for a strengthened effect of knowledge of cognition on problem representation.
conclusionsThe MIND learning model provides a practice-embedded framework for strengthening diagnostic metacognition in novice physicians. By integrating explicit metacognitive scaffolds into authentic clinical encounters, the model enhances learners' awareness of their reasoning processes and supports more effective problem framing. These findings offer actionable guidance for clinical educators seeking to incorporate metacognitive instruction into workplace-based training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.