Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42015464›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council2026

Gendering the Menstrual Cycle in Behavioral Neuroendocrinology.

Annie Duchesne, Kiranjot Kaur Jhajj, Nicole White

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annie DuchesnePsychology Department, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
Kiranjot Kaur JhajjPsychology Department, Memorial University, St John, Newfoundland, Canada.
Nicole WhitePsychology Department, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-0006-4432

Funding

Michael Smith Health Research BC SCH-2023-3199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The menstrual cycle is increasingly described as a "vital sign of the female body," with the literature suggesting cycle-related brain and behavioral changes. With growing interest in the effects that the menstrual cycle has on the brain, body and mind, characterizing what constitutes healthy cycle-related change has become a central goal of behavioral neuroendocrinology. Considering the epistemological importance of research in behavioral neuroendocrinology for shaping our understanding of cycle-related effects in menstruating people, a critical examination of how the menstrual cycle is operationalized and studied in this field is warranted. In this narrative review, we first describe some methodological gold standards for investigating the menstrual cycle as an acontextual sex-related neurohormonal phenomenon, while highlighting ongoing limitations. We then introduce alternative conceptualizations that operationalize the menstrual cycle as context-contingent and demonstrate the importance of environmental experiences, particularly stress, in influencing cycle-related brain and behavioral changes. Grounded in a feminist/queer approach to sex/gender difference, we propose a conceptualization of the menstrual cycle that integrates gendered sources of stress and discuss the potential of this approach to enable a more representative operationalization that better accounts for its inherent variability.

Indexed as

BrainMenstrual CycleNeuroendocrinologyFemaleHumansbehavioral neuroendocrinologyfeminist/queer sciencehuman reproductive ecologymenstrual cyclemenstruation stigmaovarian hormonessex/gender entanglement

Identifiers

PMID42015464
PMCPMC13100345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.