ReviewAmerican journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council2026
Gendering the Menstrual Cycle in Behavioral Neuroendocrinology.
Review in American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The menstrual cycle is increasingly described as a "vital sign of the female body," with the literature suggesting cycle-related brain and behavioral changes. With growing interest in the effects that the menstrual cycle has on the brain, body and mind, characterizing what constitutes healthy cycle-related change has become a central goal of behavioral neuroendocrinology. Considering the epistemological importance of research in behavioral neuroendocrinology for shaping our understanding of cycle-related effects in menstruating people, a critical examination of how the menstrual cycle is operationalized and studied in this field is warranted. In this narrative review, we first describe some methodological gold standards for investigating the menstrual cycle as an acontextual sex-related neurohormonal phenomenon, while highlighting ongoing limitations. We then introduce alternative conceptualizations that operationalize the menstrual cycle as context-contingent and demonstrate the importance of environmental experiences, particularly stress, in influencing cycle-related brain and behavioral changes. Grounded in a feminist/queer approach to sex/gender difference, we propose a conceptualization of the menstrual cycle that integrates gendered sources of stress and discuss the potential of this approach to enable a more representative operationalization that better accounts for its inherent variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.