Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42015397›Full record

ReviewJournal of fish biology2026

Fish welfare in a changing world: New developments and current challenges.

Sonia Rey Planellas, João L Saraiva, Eliane Gonçalves-de-Freitas, Pablo Arechavala-Lopez, Bernice Bovenkerk, Michael Breen, Steven J Cooke, Martin Føre, Lene Northwood, Lars Helge Stien and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sonia Rey PlanellasInstitute of Aquaculture, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Scotland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3406-3291
João L SaraivaCentre of Marine Sciences, CCMAR/CIMAR LA, Faro, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8891-8881
Eliane Gonçalves-de-FreitasDepartment of Biological Sciences, Institute of Bioscience, Letters and Exact Science of the São Paulo State University (UNESP), and Aquaculture Center of UNESP, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-3035
Pablo Arechavala-LopezMediterranean Institute of Advanced Studies, IMEDEA-CSIC/UIB, Esporles, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6816-8542
Bernice BovenkerkSocial Sciences Group, Philosophy, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Michael BreenFisheries Research Group, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
Steven J CookeDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Martin FøreDepartment of Engineering Cybernetics, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Lene NorthwoodIndependent law scholar.
Lars Helge StienAnimal Welfare Research Group, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
Sunil KadriRINA, Research Institute for Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Brinkin, Australia.
Chris NobleDivision of Aquaculture, Nofima, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2941-5384
Jonatan NilssonAnimal Welfare Research Group, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
Fernando RodriguezLaboratory of Psychobiology, University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Cosme SalasLaboratory of Psychobiology, University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Peter SandøeDepartment of Food and Resource Economics and Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hans van de VisWageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

Funding

Fisheries Society of the British Isles
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The welfare of non-human animals is central to ethical discussions on animal use, with increasing attention to fish welfare across research, aquaria, aquaculture, and fisheries. This paper reviews current theoretical approaches to animal welfare and recent advances in defining and assessing fish welfare since the seminal paper by Huntingford et al. (2006; J Fish Biol 68: 332-372), highlighting the growing role of cognitive and affective processes. It also includes the concept of positive welfare and some of the current research advances in this field. Methods for measuring, monitoring and assessing welfare via the utilisation of outcome- and input-based indicators are outlined, ranging from practical operational tools to laboratory-based measures. Welfare concerns in wild-capture fisheries are examined in relation to stress, flesh quality and sustainability, including the welfare of released fish. Recent advances in fish neurobiology, cognition and pain perception are summarised, together with technological innovations that enhance welfare monitoring and management. The paper also explores the relationship between fish welfare, sustainability, public concerns and consumer demand, and legal and moral recognition across contexts, situating fish welfare within the 'One Health' and 'One Welfare' frameworks that link animal welfare, environmental stewardship and human well-being. Ongoing challenges include climate change, cultural factors and the interpretation of fish sentience and cognition among others.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareFishesAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesFisheriesaquacultureaquatic animalsfisheriesOne Health/One Welfaresustainabilitywelfare indicators

Identifiers

PMID42015397
PMCPMC13521753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.