ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2026
Modern contraceptive discontinuation and demand-and-supply-side method-mix in urban settings in Eastern Uganda: a mixed methods study.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFamily planning (FP) is a key public health intervention with broad health, social, and economic benefits. However, access and sustained use remain limited in many low- and middle-income countries. In Uganda, rapid urbanization presents new challenges, including inequities in modern contraceptive access and continuity. We examined how demand- and supply-side factors influence method mix and discontinuation in the urban settings of Jinja and Iganga in Eastern Uganda.
methodWe used secondary data from the Urban Thrive Project collected from November 2021 to March 2022 in Jinja City and Iganga Municipality. The dataset included 1,023 women (15–49 years), a health facility assessment (N = 150), and qualitative data from 24 in-depth interviews and 12 focus group discussions. Quantitative analysis assessed modern contraceptive method mix using method skew and the average deviation (AD) index, with logistic regression used to identify factors associated with discontinuation. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed using an inductive approach to explore factors shaping modern contraceptive method choice and discontinuation.
resultsDemand-side modern contraceptive method mix was dominated by injectables (36%), implants (24%), and condoms (20%) with AD index (10%) confirming an imbalance in method use. Condom use was more common among younger and unmarried women, while implants were reported mostly by wealthier and more educated women. Qualitative findings underscored accessibility, affordability, and relationship dynamics as key determinants of modern contraceptive method choice and continuity. Modern contraceptive method discontinuation rate was 7%, mainly due to side effects and partner opposition and was more likely among women aged 35–49 (aOR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.13–1.57), the poor (aOR = 4.77; 95% CI: 3.76–6.06), and those with secondary/higher education (aOR = 8.84; 95% CI: 4.60–16.98). Conversely, being married (aOR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.75–0.99) and exposed to FP information (aOR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.16–0.21) were protective.
conclusionThe imbalance in method mix and the reported discontinuation rate reflect supply- and demand-side limitations, with implications for voluntary FP. Addressing these through broader method availability, better counseling, and accurate information is key to supporting informed and sustained use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.