Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42015315›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental evidence2026

Characterising ecosystem service provision by two morphologically distinct kelp species (Laminaria hyperborea and Saccharina latissima) and the biophysical drivers shaping these services: a systematic map protocol.

Benjamin Hall, Patrick Eskuche-Keith, Yaofa Ren, Pippa Jane Moore, Clare Fitzsimmons, Fabrice Stephenson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental evidence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin HallSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. b.hall8@newcastle.ac.uk.
Patrick Eskuche-KeithSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Yaofa RenSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Pippa Jane MooreSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Clare FitzsimmonsSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Fabrice StephensonSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImportant ecosystem services (ES), defined by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment as benefits people obtain from ecosystems, are provided by kelp forests (e.g. nutrient cycling, nursery sites for fisheries and habitat provision). However, kelp forest degradation is extensive and ongoing with 40–60% of kelp forests degraded over the past 50 years threatening ES provision. Management efforts often overlook species-specific biophysical drivers of service provision and the role of morphological diversity (e.g. stipitate or prostrate growth forms) in mediating ES. Effective marine spatial planning that incorporates ES provision requires understanding of these drivers, but current efforts are limited by poor spatial data on kelp distributions and ES provision. This systematic map aims (i) to catalogue and classify the ecosystem services that have been reported for Laminaria hyperborea and Saccharina latissima (two kelp species with contrasting growth forms), and (ii) to map what evidence exists on biophysical drivers associated with variation in these services.

methodsFollowing Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE) guidelines, this systematic map will conduct a search of peer-reviewed literature from Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar using terms for kelp species and ES, refined via the PO framework (Population, Outcome). Search string replicability will be validated using 10 benchmark articles. The screening process will utilize a three-stage process (remove duplicates, title and abstract screening and full text screening) which will prioritise studies quantifying ES provision (e.g. wave attenuation, biodiversity metrics, kelp farming) and/or biophysical drivers of ES provision for Laminaria hyperborea and Saccharina latissima. Data will be synthesized narratively and, where feasible, presented through tables, figures and geographic mapping that compares ES across growth form and biophysical drivers (e.g., light availability for primary productivity, turbidity for carbon sequestration). This systematic map aims to identify gaps in knowledge of kelp service provision, with the results highlighting kelp ES knowledge to guide future and current marine spatial planning.

Indexed as

Ecosystem servicesKelp bedsMarine conservationMarine spatial managementSystematic map

Identifiers

PMID42015315
PMCPMC13255359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.