ArticleBMC research notes2026
Testing newly developed PCR primers for high-specificity enrichment of bees from terrestrial eDNA.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePlant-derived environmental DNA (eDNA) considerably improved our ability to study terrestrial arthropod communities. However, bee pollinators are still underrepresented in eDNA analyses. Here we designed several PCR primers based on previously published primers, to enrich insect eDNA from plant-derived eDNA. We validate the primers with a focus on their utility to reconstruct pollinator communities, particularly bees. We tested our primers using mock communities of different bee species and field collected flower eDNA samples.
resultsAll our primers are highly promising to enrich insect eDNA from plant material. They recovered all bee species from the mock communities and approximated their relative abundance. Moreover, we found highly diverse insect communities from field-collected samples using the new primers. Interestingly, the original, unmodified primer performed, for the small dataset we analysed, slightly better for recovering bees compared to the ones designed by us especially for bees. Combining all primers seems to be the most effective. Our study highlights the great promise of eDNA metabarcoding for the monitoring of plant associated insects, especially bees. Each of the primer sets tested show similar results in bee and arthropod community diversity making them a good choice for monitoring arthropods and especially bee pollinators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.