Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42015270›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026

Early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus with clinical characteristics, cell-free DNA and genetic variants.

Songchang Chen, Lulu Wang, Qun Zhu, Fan Wang, Chao Tang, Bin Zhang, Yi Shi, Mengdi Liu, Cong Liu, Yuling Wang and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Songchang Chen *Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lulu Wang *Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qun Zhu *Department of Medical Genetics, Yueyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yueyang, China.
Fan Wang *Basecare Medical Device Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China.
Chao Tang *Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Bin ZhangChangzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China.
Yi ShiBio-X Institutes, Key Laboratory for the Genetics of Developmental and Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Mengdi LiuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Cong LiuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yuling WangObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xianling CaoObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Mengqiu ChengObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Mindan PengDepartment of Medical Genetics, Yueyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yueyang, China.
Yan YuanDepartment of Medical Genetics, Yueyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yueyang, China.
Lingyin KongSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Bo LiangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic and Developmental Sciences, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhonghua ShiChangzhou Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China. szh@njmu.edu.cn.
Hefeng HuangObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. huanghefg@hotmail.com.
Chenming XuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. chenming_xu2006@163.com.
Yanting WuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. yanting_wu@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2293-1792

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) remains a prevalent and heterogeneous pregnancy complication with limited strategies for early identification. We aimed to investigate efficient approaches for early prediction of GDM with clinical and genetic risk factors.

methodsA previously developed machine-learning model based on clinical characteristics achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77. To improve predictive accuracy, we further collected non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results from 595 pregnant women (295 with GDM, 300 without). A cumulative polygenic risk score (PRS) was calculated using 1,170 selected single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Logistic regression, support vector machines, random forest, decision tree, linear model and naïve Bayes machine learning models were employed. External validation was performed with an additional 2,350 blood samples independently collected from two other centers.

resultsLogistic regression analysis showed that the PRS alone achieved an AUC of 0.75 for GDM discrimination. From cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing performed during NIPT, we identified 357 gene transcripts with differential coverage at transcription start sites. A cfDNA-based linear model achieved an AUC of 0.83 using a subset of 166 signature genes, which reached 0.85 when combined with clinical features. Integration of clinical features, cfDNA, and SNVs yielded the highest performance using a random forest model (AUC = 0.89, specificity = 0.74, sensitivity = 0.89). For external validation, a clinically practical model incorporating clinical features and cfDNA achieved an AUC of 0.83 using linear approach.

conclusionsOur GDM prediction model has reached high accuracy fully using accessible clinical and genetic data routinely generated from current antenatal testing, enabling early screening and interventions for women at risk.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsDiabetes, GestationalGenetic VariationAdultArea Under CurveClassification AlgorithmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic Risk ScoreHumansLogistic ModelsPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPregnancyRisk FactorsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsGenetic risk factorsGestational diabetes mellitusNon-invasive prenatal testingPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID42015270
PMCPMC13137655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.