ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2026
Long-term impacts of co-designed sustainable park improvements on physical activity and other wellbeing behaviours: a 7-year natural experimental study in a deprived urban area.
Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCreating or improving urban parks is a promising intervention for promoting physical activity (PA). However, robust natural experimental evidence of effectiveness remains limited, particularly regarding long-term impacts. We previously showed that co-designed, sustainable urban park improvements in a deprived UK area increased walking and other wellbeing-related behaviours up to 15 months post-intervention. We now examine whether these effects were sustained five years post-intervention (seven years after baseline).
methodsTwo intervention sites were matched to two comparison sites, with two additional nearby comparison sites included to assess wider neighbourhood trends. Outcomes were assessed using systematic observations at baseline (2018), 15 months post-intervention (2021), and five years post-intervention (2025). The primary outcome was change in the number of people walking; secondary outcomes included vigorous PA, sedentary behaviour, social interactions, and taking notice of the environment. Multilevel mixed-effects negative binomial regression models compared changes between intervention and comparison sites, adjusting for day of week, time of day, and precipitation. Additional analyses compared 15-month (2021) and five-year (2025) follow-ups to assess how intervention effects evolved over time. Intercept surveys assessed self-reported outdoor space use at baseline (2019; n = 217) and follow-up (2025; n = 232).
resultsFrom baseline to five years post-intervention, walking at the intervention sites significantly increased by 70% relative to the comparison sites (IRR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.02–2.82). Significant increases were also observed for sedentary behaviour, social interactions, and taking notice of the environment. Comparison of the 15-month and five-year follow-ups indicated some attenuation of intervention effects over time. Observations at nearby comparison sites suggested that these effects were not attributable to wider neighbourhood trends. The largest increases in observed park use were among young people and non-white ethnic groups. Intercept surveys corroborated the observational findings, showing significantly greater increases in self-reported outdoor space use in the intervention area.
conclusionsCo-designed, sustainable urban park improvements can generate long-term increases in walking and other wellbeing-related behaviours in deprived urban areas, with effects persisting for at least five years. Urban green space interventions, which can target areas with the greatest need, therefore represent an effective long-term strategy for increasing PA. STUDY PROTOCOL: Study protocol published in Open Science Framework before the first follow-up data collection finished ( https://osf.io/zqgcn ). Date of registration: 18 August 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.