Trial reportInternational journal for equity in health2026
The impact of vision care program on the mental health of migrant children in Eastern China: evidence from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVision impairment is common among children and is known to affect learning, but its impact on children’s mental health has received less attention, especially in low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to focus on a school-based vision care intervention for migrant children in China to examine how the intervention affect children’s mental health.
methodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted to examine the causal impact of a vision care intervention on children’s mental health in 94 migrant schools. After baseline screening of 4,376 students, 682 children with visual impairments were assigned to either intervention or control groups. The intervention included distributing free eyeglasses, providing teacher incentives to encourage utilization, and offering informational education. Follow-up survey was conducted after six months. 309 children in the intervention group and 327 in the control group were included in the analysis. Intention-to-treat effects were estimated with standard errors clustered at the school level.
resultsOverall, the intervention resulted in a significantly higher risk of mental health issues among migrant children, particularly learning anxiety. The adverse effects disproportionately impacted children whose teachers did not support wearing glasses, whose parents or peers did not wear glasses, and who had moderate or severe vision impairment. The lack of support from teachers hindered students from developing positive perceptions of glasses use and acquiring knowledge about vision care, which subsequently negatively influenced their mental health.
conclusionProviding eyeglasses alone may not be sufficient to improve the well-being of migrant children. Without support from teachers, parents, and peers, vision care programs may lead to unintended increases in anxiety. School-based health programs should consider both physical and mental health needs and place greater emphasis on the social environment in which interventions are delivered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.