ArticleHealth research policy and systems2026
Advancing knowledge translation practices to accelerate change in adolescent and youth sexual and reproductive health practice: a scoping review.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
More effective knowledge translation (KT) in the field of adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) could improve the speed at which effective health and behavioural interventions are delivered to young people, improving their overall health and well-being. Given the limited literature on KT for ASRH, this scoping review synthesizes the evidence on the barriers and facilitators to knowledge translation in ASRH in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Our review combines a rapid scoping review of relevant published and grey literature on the facilitators and barriers to knowledge translation of ASRH in LMICs, where available, and knowledge translation in health care settings and health policy making more generally, as well as key informant interviews (KIIs) with ASRH implementers, policy-makers and researchers on the factors that shape the translation of evidence to ASRH policy and practice in Africa. Two reviewers systematically used a predetermined search string to retrieve studies in eight databases. After applying exclusion criteria, 53 full-length studies were included. Researchers extracted data on the key areas of interest, including KT approaches, barriers, determinants, facilitators, key lessons and best practices. KIIs were conducted with 22 participants. Interviews were transcribed, summarized for themes and then analysed. Data were then reorganized into categories and key themes organized using the KT framework developed by Jacobson et al. Barriers and facilitators for KT in ASRH mirror those the health sector faces more generally, such as the strength of existing knowledge management practices, the relationship between knowledge producers and consumers, and differences in the needs of knowledge producers and knowledge users. Specific considerations for ASRH identified were an overemphasis on research products and an underemphasis on relationship building, the political nature of adolescent sexuality and the need to engage more diverse voices in knowledge production and translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.