Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42015229›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2026

Building virtual real-time trauma care learning during armed conflict: the case of ECHO in Ukraine.

Léa Sinno, Yesser Sebeh, Marta Antoniv, Paola Arenas, Nelya Melnitchouk, Katie Murray, Brigg Reilley, Iiris Rinne, Bruce Struminger, Alexandra Zuber and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Léa SinnoHarvard Humanitarian Initiative (HHI), Boston, Massachusetts, USA. lsinno@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6546-382X
Yesser SebehAta Health Strategies, LLC, Washington, D.C., USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4529-253X
Marta AntonivDepartment of Surgery, Mass General Brigham (MGB), Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-8510-0413
Paola ArenasAta Health Strategies, LLC, Washington, D.C., USA.
Nelya MelnitchoukDepartment of Surgery, Mass General Brigham (MGB), Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Katie MurrayHarvard Humanitarian Initiative (HHI), Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brigg ReilleyECHO Institute, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7547-484X
Iiris RinneECHO Institute, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Bruce StrumingerECHO Institute, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-2257
Alexandra ZuberAta Health Strategies, LLC, Washington, D.C., USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-1421
Sean M KivlehanHarvard Humanitarian Initiative (HHI), Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4857-4316

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArmed conflicts threaten the resilience of health systems and the continuity of medical education. The war in Ukraine has impacted the health infrastructure and depleted the workforce, highlighting the need for trauma care training to strengthen healthcare professionals' capacity to provide care. Sustaining training remotely may offer a practical way to overcome limitations of in-person courses. In response, the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative (HHI), in collaboration with Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) at the University of New Mexico, piloted a virtual case-based community of practice (VCoP) to strengthen the delivery of trauma care in Ukraine and bridge initial in-person training.

methodsTen VCoP sessions were implemented between October and December. Participation was offered to all Ukrainian trauma care trainers who participated in prior in-person training. The assessment survey was sent to all VCoP session participants and evaluated program feasibility, reach, engagement, and perceived impact. Highly engaged participants were invited to an additional virtual interview to provide additional feedback. Implementation and outcomes were measured with a mixed-methods formative evaluation. Analysis included attendance data, post-session and end-of-series surveys, and semi-structured interviews.

resultsForty-four Ukrainian trauma trainers who participated in earlier in-person education participated in at least one session, representing 10 oblasts (administrative regions) in Ukraine. Post-session survey response rate averaged 74%. 94% of participants indicated applying knowledge from the sessions in their practice or teaching and 89% reported changes in their practice and innovation in their teaching methods. 94% of participants reported that the program helped them increase professional connectedness. All participants expressed interest in participating in future VCoP sessions with 77% expressing interest in leading future sessions.

conclusionThe Ukraine Trauma Care VCoP demonstrated that virtual education can be feasible and effective in bridging initial training and capacity strengthening of healthcare providers in conflict settings, providing sustainability. Future efforts should evaluate the ability of this model to adapt and scale in similar contexts.

Indexed as

Armed ConflictsDelivery of Health CareEducation, DistanceHealth PersonnelWounds and InjuriesHumansProgram EvaluationUkraineConflictDigital health educationGlobal healthHealth systems strengtheningHealth workforceLocalizationSustainabilityTrauma care trainingUkraineVirtual community of practice

Identifiers

PMID42015229
PMCPMC13352992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.