ArticleHuman resources for health2026
Building virtual real-time trauma care learning during armed conflict: the case of ECHO in Ukraine.
Article in Human resources for health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArmed conflicts threaten the resilience of health systems and the continuity of medical education. The war in Ukraine has impacted the health infrastructure and depleted the workforce, highlighting the need for trauma care training to strengthen healthcare professionals' capacity to provide care. Sustaining training remotely may offer a practical way to overcome limitations of in-person courses. In response, the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative (HHI), in collaboration with Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) at the University of New Mexico, piloted a virtual case-based community of practice (VCoP) to strengthen the delivery of trauma care in Ukraine and bridge initial in-person training.
methodsTen VCoP sessions were implemented between October and December. Participation was offered to all Ukrainian trauma care trainers who participated in prior in-person training. The assessment survey was sent to all VCoP session participants and evaluated program feasibility, reach, engagement, and perceived impact. Highly engaged participants were invited to an additional virtual interview to provide additional feedback. Implementation and outcomes were measured with a mixed-methods formative evaluation. Analysis included attendance data, post-session and end-of-series surveys, and semi-structured interviews.
resultsForty-four Ukrainian trauma trainers who participated in earlier in-person education participated in at least one session, representing 10 oblasts (administrative regions) in Ukraine. Post-session survey response rate averaged 74%. 94% of participants indicated applying knowledge from the sessions in their practice or teaching and 89% reported changes in their practice and innovation in their teaching methods. 94% of participants reported that the program helped them increase professional connectedness. All participants expressed interest in participating in future VCoP sessions with 77% expressing interest in leading future sessions.
conclusionThe Ukraine Trauma Care VCoP demonstrated that virtual education can be feasible and effective in bridging initial training and capacity strengthening of healthcare providers in conflict settings, providing sustainability. Future efforts should evaluate the ability of this model to adapt and scale in similar contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.