ReviewBMC women's health2026
Sacituzumab govitecan combined with tislelizumab as second-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: a case report and literature review.
Review in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe second-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer remains uncertain and controversial. Sacituzumab govitecan, the first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP2), has demonstrated promising efficacy and safety in several clinical trials for cervical cancer. However, real-world clinical data on sacituzumab govitecan combined with immunotherapy remains limited. CASE PRESENTATION: A 73-year-old woman diagnosed with stage IIIC1r (FIGO 2018) cervical squamous cell carcinoma underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy as the primary treatment. The disease recurred 20 months later; thus 3 cycles of chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab and additional 5 cycles of bevacizumab monotherapy were recommended. Although the patient achieved complete response in both the primary treatment and the first recurrence treatment, the second recurrence was detected 15 months later. The patient underwent 6 cycles of sacituzumab govitecan combined with tislelizumab and additional 6 cycles of tislelizumab monotherapy. Partial response was achieved with an 88.1% reduction in target lesion size, along with a PFS of 9 months and an ongoing OS of 13 months.
conclusionsSacituzumab govitecan combined with tislelizumab demonstrated potential treatment response in this case. However, further prospective clinical trials are warranted to validate its efficacy and safety in the difficult second-line setting of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.