ArticleBMC public health2026
Identifying risk profiles and systemic architecture of online aggressive behavior among college students: a large-scale cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOnline aggressive behavior (OAB) is a growing public health concern among young adults. However, most studies focus on isolated risk factors rather than their complex interplay. This study aimed to identify hierarchical risk profiles and map the systemic architecture of OAB among Chinese college students.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted with 5,431 college students in China. We integrated Classification Tree Analysis (CTA) using the CHAID algorithm to identify high-risk subgroups and Network Analysis (Ising model) to map the conditional dependencies among 15 OAB items and 7 key risk factors.
resultsThe overall prevalence of OAB was 56.8%. CTA identified video game engagement as the primary stratifying variable (χ² = 280.24, p < 0.001), revealing a clear risk gradient: competitive gaming (64.5%) > non-competitive gaming (60.5%) > no gaming (35.7%). Alcohol use and internet use further stratified these groups. The highest-risk profile (89.0% prevalence) was identified among non-competitive gamers who used alcohol and reported poor academic performance. The network analysis (95 edges; density = 0.411) identified competitive gaming as the central hub (highest Strength) and “Hacking to steal identities” as a highly influential node. “Insulting others in games” emerged as the critical bridge node (highest Bridge Strength). All network indices showed high stability (CS-coefficient ≥ 0.75).
conclusionsOAB is highly prevalent among Chinese college students and its risk is structured hierarchically, with competitive gaming acting as a key high-risk context. Public health strategies could benefit from moving beyond universal approaches to targeted interventions aimed at specific high-risk profiles and disrupting central nodes and bridging behaviors within the OAB system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.