ArticleBMC oral health2026
Assessment of the remineralizing potential of nano-bioactive glass, nano-hydroxyapatite, and sodium fluoride on artificial carious lesions in primary teeth.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTooth decay represents a dynamic balance characterized by alternating cycles of demineralization and remineralization, though loss of minerals can be reversed in its early stages. Recently, nanomaterials have been widely explored in dentistry due to their remarkable characteristics and enhanced remineralization potential. This study aimed to assess the remineralization performance of three varnishes on artificial enamel lesions in primary teeth: commercial fluoride varnish (5% NaF + ACP), experimental nano-bioactive glass (6% n-BAG), and experimental nano-hydroxyapatite (10% n-HAP).
methodsThe twenty-eight extracted primary molars were randomly divided into four groups: Group 1 (Enamel Pro), Group 2 (n-BAG), Group 3 (n-HAP), and Group 4 (control). Specimens were submerged in a demineralization medium for 96 h to create artificial enamel lesions measuring 4 × 4 mm. Commercial and experimental varnishes were applied to specimens, followed by 24 h of storage in artificial saliva and 7 days of pH cycling. The Scanning Electron Microscope and Energy Dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX) were employed to assess the specimens at baseline, post-demineralization, post-remineralization, and following pH cycling. Lesion depth was examined by polarized light microscopy (PLM). Statistical evaluation was conducted using Repeated Measures ANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc, Friedman, Wilcoxon signed-rank one-way ANOVA, Tukey's post hoc, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Pearson correlation tests.
resultsEDX showed highly significant intra-group increases in Ca Wt.% for all materials (P < 0.001). Inter-group differences were significant (P < 0.05) after remineralization and pH cycling. After both stages, the Ca/P ratio showed highly significant intra-group changes (P < 0.001) and significant inter-group differences. n-BAG recorded the highest Ca and Ca/P values, while the control showed the lowest. SEM images revealed complete and uniform surface coverage in n-BAG, partial surface recovery in Enamel Pro and n-HAP, and persistent porosities in the control. PLM confirmed the lowest lesion depth in n-BAG. A moderate negative correlation was found between lesion depth and the Ca/P ratio.
conclusionn-BAG and n-HAP exhibited superior efficiency after pH cycling compared to Enamel Pro, suggesting their potential as preventive agents for managing initial enamel caries in primary teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.