ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
AMD-UPerNet: a tool for retinal layer and fluid assessment in age-related macular degeneration.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to develop a rapid and precise OCT segmentation model that simultaneously delineates retinal layers and fluid regions in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
methodsAMD-UPerNet was proposed as the segmentation model designed to simultaneously delineate retinal layers and fluid compartments in OCT images. Key innovations include: (1) Swin Transformer was adopted as the backbone to extract multi-scale features and model global contextual relationships; (2) Content-Aware ReAssembly of FEatures (CARAFE) module was introduced into feature pyramid network to improve up-sampling and mitigate feature loss; (3) The combination of cross-entropy and Dice loss was used to handle class imbalance and reduce mis-segmentation of fluid regions.
resultCompared to the models such as PSPNet, DANet, OCNet, DenseASPP, SAM, MedSAM, and SegFormer, AMD-UPerNet achieved superior performance, with a Pixel Accuracy (PA) of 98.51%, Mean Pixel Accuracy (MPA) of 87.49%, Mean Precision (MPre) of 89.40%, and Mean Intersection over Union (MIoU) of 80.53%.
conclusionUnlike previous methods that segment retinal layers and fluid regions separately, our model uses a joint framework that enables simultaneous optimization and contextual interaction. By using the anatomical continuity of retinal layers as structural priors, AMD-UPerNet improves fluid localization and enhances robustness against ambiguous boundaries and low-contrast regions. These results highlight AMD-UPerNet’s potential to improve OCT segmentation accuracy and efficiency, facilitating early diagnosis and optimized treatment for AMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.