Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42015027›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2026

Ready for a warming world? A multi-domain evaluation of intern doctors' climate-health knowledge and sustainable practice patterns.

Yıldız Büyükdereli Atadağ, Ilknur Demir, Selma Demir Yanik, Tuba Saygili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yıldız Büyükdereli AtadağDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, TR-27310, Turkey. yildizatadag@gmail.com.
Ilknur DemirDepartment of Geriatrics, Medical Faculty, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Selma Demir YanikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Tuba SaygiliŞehitkamil District Health Directorate, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to assess levels of awareness, knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to climate change and sustainability in health care among final-year medical students (intern doctors), and to examine the relationships between these domains.

methodsThis descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted between 12 August and 24 October 2025 among intern doctors enrolled at Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine. Data from 167 interns who agreed to participate and completed the questionnaire in full were analyzed. Data were collected via an online questionnaire developed by the researchers based on a literature review, consisting of sections on sociodemographic characteristics, awareness, objective knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to climate change and sustainability in health care. Total scores were calculated for the awareness, knowledge, attitude and behavior sections. Descriptive statistics, t tests, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation and hierarchical multiple linear regression were used for data analysis. Internal consistency of the questionnaire sections was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients.

resultsThe mean age of participants was 24.03 ± 1.36 years, and 52.1% were female. While perceived knowledge was mostly rated as low or moderate, objective knowledge scores indicated that 44.9% of students had moderate and 53.3% had good knowledge levels. Mean awareness scores were high (6.04 ± 1.27), attitude scores reflected moderately positive attitudes (6.38 ± 1.18), and behavior scores were lower, particularly in daily-life and clinical practice domains (overall behavior score 10.31 ± 3.89). Only 7.8% of participants reported discussing climate change with most of their patients; the most frequently reported barriers were lack of time (75.4%), perceived patient disinterest (69.5%) and insufficient knowledge (60.5%). Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for the awareness, attitude and behavior sections were 0.65, 0.70 and 0.78 respectively, indicating acceptable internal consistency, whereas the coefficient for the knowledge section was 0.40. Higher perceived knowledge and greater involvement in sustainability initiatives within the hospital were associated with significantly higher scores in some behavior domains. There was a weak but statistically significant positive correlation between knowledge and attitude scores (r = 0.172, p = 0.026), whereas no significant relationships were observed between knowledge or awareness scores and behavior scores.

conclusionAlthough intern doctors demonstrated relatively high levels of awareness and knowledge regarding climate change and sustainability in health care, these did not fully translate into corresponding changes in clinical and everyday behaviors. The weak relationship between knowledge and behavior suggests that information alone is insufficient to drive behavior change, and that motivational, institutional and structural support mechanisms are needed. Medical education should therefore be restructured to strengthen the climate-health nexus through both theoretical content and the promotion of environmentally sustainable clinical practices.

trial registrationNot applicable. This study did not involve a health care intervention or clinical trial.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClimate ChangeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInternship and ResidencyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Students, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyYoung AdultClimate changeIntern doctorsKnowledge-attitude-behaviorMedical educationSustainable healthcare

Identifiers

PMID42015027
PMCPMC13231613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.