ArticleBMC primary care2026
Exploring primary care doctors' perceptions on their roles in palliative care in Singapore: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingapore faces a rapidly aging population with increasing multimorbidity, creating an urgent need for expanded palliative care services. Despite primary care physicians (PCPs) being ideally positioned to provide palliative care throughout patients’ disease trajectories, their role remains underdeveloped in Singapore’s healthcare system. This study aimed to explore PCPs’ perceptions of their roles in providing palliative care to patients with life-limiting illnesses in Singapore’s primary care setting.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study at two SingHealth Polyclinics with distinct patient population demographic profiles. Using purposive sampling, we recruited 20 PCPs with at least 12 months of primary care experience, representing various professional designations. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions from September to December 2023. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using a thematic approach.
resultsOur analysis revealed a dichotomy between PCPs’ recognition of their potential roles in palliative care and their reservations about fulfilling these responsibilities. While participants identified several important functions they could serve—including needs assessments, symptom management, advance care planning, psychosocial support, and care coordination—many expressed significant concerns about implementation. These perceptions were shaped by uncertainty regarding their place in the palliative care ecosystem, concerns about patient and specialist expectations, and personal comfort levels with end-of-life discussions. Additionally, some PCPs perceived that patients viewed them primarily as providers for routine or chronic care, not for managing complex end-of-life needs, which further affected their sense of role clarity in palliative care.
conclusionsPCPs in Singapore recognise their potential contributions to palliative care but experience uncertainty regarding their roles in current primary care settings. These perceptions are shaped by variability in training and experience, unclear role boundaries, and patient and specialist expectations. Strengthening role clarity, training, and collaboration with specialist services may support the integration of palliative care into primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.