ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Cross-sectional study of workplace violence prevention training among emergency medical services personnel and students.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorkplace violence (WPV) in emergency medical services (EMS) has become a part of everyday life, constituting an occupational safety risk for paramedics. This study aimed to explore EMS personnel and students' experiences and expectations regarding WPV prevention training.
methodsA cross-sectional study using data collected via social media. The survey included structured and open-ended questions that were analyzed by using descriptive statistics and inductive content analysis.
resultsA total of 124 EMS personnel responded, with 93% having received WPV prevention training during their studies or at work. Key topics included anticipation, planning and preparedness (92%), occupational safety (87%), and situational awareness (84%). Less covered topics were organizational reporting (41%), filing a criminal report (30%), and screening previous risk information (14%). Among those who had received training, 90% found it useful, citing benefits like improved preparedness, situation management, safety, and a sense of security. As the result of a qualitative analysis, the main category Consistent training to reinforce safe practices and resilience was created. This category consisted of three sub- categories: Consistency, Safe working practices, and Attention to psychological resilience and recovery.
conclusionsTraining appears to be well-structured, but it seems to lack uniformity and does not fully meet the needs of EMS personnel and students. In particular, the portion of the training related to aftercare in WPV situations seems to receive insufficient attention. Further research is needed to determine how WPV prevention training should be developed. The knowledge gained from this study can be utilized in educational institutes and EMS organizations to support the development of WPV prevention training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.