ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Host matters: coral reef fish species show distinct skin microbiome responses to upwelling-driven environmental changes.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDisentangling the drivers structuring microbiomes can help predict organisms’ responses to rapid environmental change. However, despite microbial communities being important for both host and environmental health, large gaps remain in our understanding of how host-associated microbiomes are structured and respond to different stimuli, especially in marine environments. Here, we leverage a seasonal upwelling gradient in Panama’s Tropical Eastern Pacific, investigating how the diversity and composition of ten coral reef fish species’ skin microbiomes compare between regions and seasons that experience different environmental conditions.
resultsFish skin microbiomes varied greatly within and among host species and were distinct from the microbiomes of the surrounding seawater. All species had diverse skin microbiomes, with a dominance of Proteobacteria (65%), Bacteroidota (13%), and Cyanobacteria (6%). Host species and trophic group played a greater role in determining fish skin microbiome structure than seasonal and regional environmental variation, despite water microbiomes responding strongly to both season and region. Nevertheless, three out of five trophic groups: the herbivores, carnivores, and planktivore, also displayed significant changes in their microbiomes during upwelling, albeit to a lesser extent than water samples, whereas the invertivores’ and omnivore’s microbiomes did not change significantly. We performed differential abundance (DA) analyses on these fish and compared microbial taxa that changed between seasons and regions in fish versus water samples. While water communities had thousands of significant DA taxa, fish had around 40 times fewer (n = 17 to 73) and only shared 47 DA taxa with the water samples. Differences between these microbial communities likely arise from both host selection via fishes’ immune system and the skin mucus serving as an environmental filter. However, neither host-associated nor environmental predictors fully explained the variation in microbiome composition, highlighting its complexity.
conclusionsOur results show how ecological differences between host species may elicit distinct microbiome responses to environmental changes, with potential cascading effects on ecosystem dynamics under global climate change. Further characterization of marine microbial communities, as well as additional physicochemical and host-related parameters, will be key to monitoring and predicting how these communities will respond to the increasingly rapid and widespread environmental changes our oceans are facing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.