ReviewInternational journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience2026
Giftedness: A Critical Analysis of Theories and Identification Methods in Light of Contemporary Neuroscience.
Review in International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giftedness is a complex and multifaceted construct that lacks clear conceptual consensus, resulting in challenges for standardizing identification criteria. Divergences between traditional psychometric models and contemporary developmental approaches create inconsistencies in assessment practices, especially when considering comorbidities with neurodevelopmental conditions such as ADHD, Autism Spectrum Disorder and Specific Learning Disorders. Central to this debate is whether giftedness should be defined solely by high IQ or expanded to include creativity, motivation and domain-specific talents-or whether these represent separate but equally relevant constructs. Theoretical models such as the Three-Ring Theory, Multiple Intelligences and the Triarchic Theory have broadened the scope of human potential. In parallel, Gagné's Differentiated Model and advances in cognitive neuroscience have revealed distinct neural patterns associated with general giftedness versus specific talents. This paper traces the epistemological evolution of giftedness from early psychometric paradigms to multidimensional frameworks, integrating neuroscientific evidence on structural, functional and cognitive correlates of high intellectual ability. Building on these insights, we propose the Differential Model of Giftedness and Talent, which conceptualizes giftedness as elevated cognitive potential, measurable through intellectual functioning, and talent as the developmental outcome emerging from the transformation of this potential into domain-specific expertise. Motivation, creativity, engagement and persistence are highlighted as key mechanisms. This integrative framework provides a clearer conceptual basis for research, identification and educational interventions in gifted populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.