ArticleScientific reports2026
Artificial intelligence-based prediction of radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula maturation using preoperative duplex examination: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Establishing a functional arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is crucial to ensure effective dialysis treatment. However, there are currently no definitive criteria for predicting AVF maturation using preoperative ultrasound. This study aims to assess the efficacy of AI-driven models in analyzing comprehensive ultrasonographic variables across multiple forearm locations to predict successful AVF maturation. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 492 cases within a cohort of 494 individuals who underwent radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation across three centers over a span of four years. The analysis involved various variables such as demographic data, cephalic vein diameters at distal (vein 1), mid (vein 2), and proximal (vein 3) locations, vein wall thickness, competing tributaries, peak systolic velocity, and radial artery waveform. To assess the predictive value of these variables, XGBoost, a machine learning model, was utilized. Significant predictors of AVF maturation included cephalic vein diameters (distal, mid, and proximal) with p-values of 0.004, 0.003, and 0.009, respectively, and competing tributaries (p < 0.001). The optimal model performance was in Stage 4, excluding vein 1 data, achieving an F1 score of 0.883, a Matthews Correlation Coefficient of 0.741, and an AUC of 86.9%. A vein 2 diameter cut-off of 4.5 mm resulted in an 89.5% success rate in maturation. This study underscores the value of comprehensive ultrasonographic assessments in predicting AVF maturation, advocating for detailed preoperative ultrasound mapping of the entire forearm to enhance AVF outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.