ArticleScientific reports2026
Strength performance of hexagonal, hollow, and perforated GFRP-Reinforced concrete units: experimental, numerical, and AI-based investigations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the structural performance of hexagonal, hollow, perforated SEAHIVE® concrete units reinforced with GFRP bars under transverse compression and flexural loading. An integrated experimental–numerical–artificial intelligence framework was developed to establish structural capacity and derive design-oriented predictive equations. Nonlinear finite element models were implemented in ABAQUS using the Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) formulation and validated against experimental load–displacement behavior and crack patterns. Parametric analysis demonstrated that element thickness is the dominant factor governing compressive capacity, with increases from 100 mm to 180 mm resulting in over 280% improvement. Increasing concrete compressive strength from 20 MPa to 40 MPa enhanced transverse compression and flexural capacities by up to 60% and 66%, respectively, while larger perforation diameters reduced capacity due to stress concentration effects. To improve practical applicability, Differential Evolution Chromosomal Gene Expression Programming (DEC-GEP) was employed to develop explicit predictive equations. The symbolic regression models achieved coefficients of determination (R²) of 0.948 for transverse compression and 0.921 for flexure, providing accurate and interpretable tools for preliminary design. The proposed framework offers a validated approach for evaluating perforated coastal concrete systems and supports their optimized application in sustainable shoreline infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.