ArticleExperimental & molecular medicine2026
Enhanced multicancer screening assay through whole-genome methylation sequencing-based multimodal cell-free DNA analysis.
Article in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early detection of multiple cancers: the era of methylation-based liquid biopsy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid and accurate detection of multiple cancers presents considerable challenges, especially for stage I disease, due to the low concentration and heterogeneous nature of circulating tumor DNA. Here we introduce an enhanced multicancer screening assay that integrates whole-genome methylation sequencing with an innovative multimodal analytical framework for cell-free DNA. The ensemble machine learning model integrates four specific cell-free DNA characteristics: average methylation fraction, copy number variation, fragment size ratio and fragment size distribution. The model underwent testing on 1415 samples, encompassing eight primary cancer types and healthy controls. The sensitivity was 93.2%, and the specificity was 95%. The test demonstrated effectiveness in detecting cancers at early stages. The sensitivity was 92.3% for stage I and 92.2% for stage II. The multimodal technique successfully combined average methylation fraction's sensitivity to early epigenetic signals with fragmentomic characteristics. This facilitated the differentiation between healthy individuals and those with early stage cancer. The model achieved an accuracy rate of 85.7% in the top 2 category for correctly identifying the tissue of origin. The results confirm that whole-genome methylation sequencing-based multimodal analysis can improve multicancer early detection technology and revolutionize cancer screening methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.