ArticleScientific reports2026
Species-specific traits determine halophyte nutrient patterns rather than plant functional types.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Halophytes are plants capable of completing their life cycle in saline soils and, depending on their ecological strategies and the environmental conditions in which they grow, they may be broadly classified into two plant functional types (PFTs): hydrohalophytes and xerohalophytes. We investigated whether distinct nutritional patterns were associated with these PFTs by comparing the nutrient content of three hydrohalophyte and three xerohalophyte species in relation to soil physicochemical properties, microbial communities, and enzymatic activities. Our results suggest that halophyte nutritional status was related to species-specific traits and local soil conditions, rather than being explained solely by PFT classification. For instance, hydrohalophytes Atriplex portulacoides and Salicornia perennis exhibited similar nutritional profiles despite contrasting soil physicochemical conditions. Statistical analyses identified soil pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, and clay and silt contents as key environmental factors associated with variation in plant nutrient concentrations. Moreover, a positive correlation was observed between silt and clay textures and microbial biomass, indicating a potential role for soil-microbe interactions in nutrient cycling. Overall, these findings indicate that nutrient dynamics in halophytes may not be fully predicted by PFT categories alone, highlighting the complex interplay between species traits and site-specific soil conditions. This underscores the value of mechanistic, species-level studies for improving our understanding of nutrient acquisition and cycling in saline ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.